Equality v Human Rights?: Same sex marriage and religious liberty | OHRH
Same-sex marriage survey: religious belief matched no vote most closely of Blaxland, where only 26% of people wanted marriage equality. Being born overseas had only a slightly positive relationship with voting no. Same sex marriage and religious liberty Hart expounded the classic thesis that it was no business of the law to seek to enforce some the principle of equality of respect for homosexual as for heterosexual relationships and. same-sex couples to marry are not mutually exclusive. Australian law facto relationships are allowed even though Religious opponents of marriage equality.
However, is there a conflict in the demands of equality and human rights law? Equality law is about the State changing society by legislating to instruct and educate institutions and individuals how they might act in their public interactions.
It is about imposing positive obligations on, among others, employers, teachers and providers of goods and services to the public. It requires them to be: It is about carving out areas of freedom for individuals — privacy, expression, exercise of religion — which the State should not interfere in except for very good reasons.
Discrimination plays a subordinate role in human rights law. If the State does seek interfere in those fundamental freedoms it has to do so only in a manner which does not discriminate on grounds of sex, race, age, religion, social status and the like.
The Bible was written for a world unlike our own. At the United States Unitarian Universalist General Assemblydelegates voted overwhelmingly that they would perform same-sex marriage ceremonies, and the church has been performing weddings with and without state sanction ever since.
Homosexuality and Hinduism There are both conservative and liberal views about homosexuality and same-sex marriages in Hinduismsimilar to many other religions. A liberal view is presented by Mathematician Shakuntala Devi, in her book, The World of Homosexuals, in which she interviewed Srinivasa Raghavachariar, head priest of the Srirangam temple.
Same sex marriage, religious freedom and the law
He said that same-sex lovers must have been cross-sex lovers in a former life. The sex may change but the soul retains its attachments, hence the love impels these souls towards one another.
- Same-sex marriage survey: religious belief matched no vote most closely
- Religious views on same-sex marriage
People of the Third Sex, "several Gaudiya Vaishnava authorities emphasize that since everyone passes through various forms, genders and species in a series of lives, we should not judge each other by the material body but view everyone equally on a spiritual plane, and be compassionate as God is.
Several weddings took place by Hindu rites, with some family support, while the suicides resulted from families forcibly separating lovers.Pastor Joel Osteen on Twitter power, and same-sex marriage
The millennia-long debate in Hindu society, somewhat suppressed in the colonial period, has revived. InHinduism Today reporter Rajiv Malik asked several Hindu swamis teachers their opinion of same-sex marriage. As law professor Carolyn Evans arguesthere are good reasons for limiting extensions to exemptions from discrimination legislation.
Such extensions would make every individual a law unto themselves. Scratch the surface, and the fundamental homophobia behind individual exemptions to sex discrimination law becomes obvious.
Religious views on same-sex marriage - Wikipedia
For it is only the allowance of discrimination in the provision of services to people with different religious convictions about sexuality that is being proposed.
Bakers, party planners, florists and caterers have had no problem up to this point providing services to people with different religious convictions. Christian florists have so far raised no objection to providing flowers to Muslim weddings, Jewish bar mitzvahs, or anyone with different religious convictions.
Arguing that religious sensitivities only need protecting with regard to sexuality, and no other area of religious conviction, suggests that this is not about freedom of religion, but about legitimising homophobia. Their end game all along?